Floating Sun » stanford http://floatingsun.net Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:53:26 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Where is CS curriculum at top schools headed? http://floatingsun.net/2009/04/03/where-is-cs-curriculum-at-top-schools-headed/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=where-is-cs-curriculum-at-top-schools-headed http://floatingsun.net/2009/04/03/where-is-cs-curriculum-at-top-schools-headed/#comments Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:47:44 +0000 Diwaker Gupta http://floatingsun.net/?p=1094 Related posts:
  1. Stanford website lame
  2. Religion in schools?
  3. New tag: research
]]>
The blogosphere was abuzz today with news of a course on developing iPhone applications in Stanford being available for free. I didn’t understand what the big fuss was about. In fact, if anything, this news has me worried.

Image courtesy: flickr.com

Stanford is undoubtedly one of the top most engineering schools in the world. In my mind, a computer science curriculum at such top schools should do just that — teach computer science. Courses that cover computer architecture, software design, operating systems, networking, graphics, theory, databases, algorithms etc all make sense to me. But a course to teach students how to use the API on a commercial SDK? I think other organizations (vocational institutes, community colleges etc) are better suited for such courses. What is so great about such courses being taught at Stanford or MIT or Berkeley? I personally think those resources could be used better elsewhere.

It seems this is part of a larger trend. More and more schools are designing courses that are aligned with the hot buzz-words in the industry, perhaps in order to attract applications. For instance, you can learn how to provide Software as a Service (SaaS) using Ruby on Rails (RoR) at Berkeley. Stanford has another class on building Facebook applications.

I would much rather see a class on say “building scalable web services” and have Facebook, Twitter as case studies in the class.

]]>
http://floatingsun.net/2009/04/03/where-is-cs-curriculum-at-top-schools-headed/feed/ 10
Stanford website lame http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/18/stanford-website-lame/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=stanford-website-lame http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/18/stanford-website-lame/#comments Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:58:56 +0000 Diwaker Gupta http://floatingsun.net/blog/2006/02/18/560/ Related posts:
  1. Yahoo!
  2. Lame post
  3. Where is CS curriculum at top schools headed?
]]>

http://www.stanford.edu works, but http://stanford.edu doesn’t. Thats //so// lame, specially for Stanford (where Google, Yahoo and several other Internet companies were born)

]]>
http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/18/stanford-website-lame/feed/ 0