Comments on: Google Reader archiving less? http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google-reader-archiving-less Sat, 11 May 2013 19:51:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Jason Adams http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less/#comment-28265 Jason Adams Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:47:50 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less#comment-28265 Yeah, stuff older than a certain period of time gets marked as read. I notice that when I add new feeds that have a lot of old stuff, the old stuff is in there but there may only be a couple “unread” items.

]]> By: Kage http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less/#comment-26883 Kage Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:59:40 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less#comment-26883 Poster above makes sense !

Will post after I finish the 1560 unread items.

]]> By: Abhishek Goyal http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less/#comment-26411 Abhishek Goyal Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:49:00 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less#comment-26411 IMHO, Entries older than 30 days they are removed from the unread count.

]]> By: Shashi http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less/#comment-26407 Shashi Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:17:25 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/2008/01/08/google-reader-archiving-less#comment-26407 I suppose there is a limit of 100 unread items per feed, can’t provide a reliable source, though.

But, the search can go back much beyond. I can clearly see the results almost 8-months old.

]]>