http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/06/superbowl-ads/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=superbowl-ads Sat, 11 May 2013 19:51:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/06/superbowl-ads/#comment-276 Priyendra Deshwal Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:03:08 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/blog/2006/02/06/524/#comment-276 I was also disappointed by the Superbowl ads especially because I was looking forward to seeing some good ones. However, I really believe that America has enough talented people (with plenty of good comic sense) that they could have come up with good funny adverts if they wanted to. Maybe its all due to some ad industry rule-of-thumb that funny ads are good for some products, slick ads are good for others, shocking, sensational ads are good for others.

]]> http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/06/superbowl-ads/#comment-273 Shashikant Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:00:50 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/blog/2006/02/06/524/#comment-273 Amul and Fevicol ads are exceptions, not rule. Though I watch TV (and the ads) rarely, I feel, in India, there is a growing feeling in the ad world that ad is going to be a big failure if it doesn’t feature a seductively (un)dressed woman, cricketer or Amitabh Bachchan.

]]> http://floatingsun.net/2006/02/06/superbowl-ads/#comment-272 Kumar Appaiah Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:28:24 +0000 http://floatingsun.net/blog/2006/02/06/524/#comment-272 +1 on Amul ads. Really, they are a part of culture for those who follow them!

]]>